What's the best ultra-compact camera your money can buy?

Before buying a digital camera, it's best to decide on a budget.
But after you decide on a budget, how do you pick a camera? Here's how.

So you've decided you want to buy an ultra compact camera. One that would fit in your pants pocket and would hopefully be able to produce reasonable, if not excellent photos.

The first thing you should do before buying any camera is decide how much you're willing to spend. Otherwise, you'd find yourself lost in a sea of opportunities, features, zooms and apertures, varying across price ranges, making it very hard to make a decision.

Best Ultra-Compact up to $100

Well, actually just above $100, the Canon PowerShot ELPH 100 comes in at $109, offering a wide set of features seldom seen in such low-priced cameras. It has a 28mm optically stabilized lens and a x4 zoom range in a 140 gram body, a 1/2.3" CMOS sensor enabling full HD videos - however with mono sound only and with no optical zoom during videos.

It's a lot of a camera for its price with and convenient additions such as a direct video button and image quality rivaling much more expensive cameras.

Canon PowerShot ELPH 100

Best Ultra-Compact up to $150

Enhancing some of the ELPH 100's features, the PowerShot ELPH 300 is one of the best cameras you can get for $150 (comes to show you what bang-for-the-buck the ELPH 100 is). The ELPH 300 has the same dimensions of the ELPH 100 (roughly 19mm thick), it has a wider 24mm lens and a larger x5 zoom range. On top of that, it enables optical zoom while taking videos, which are recorded with stereo sound, as well. Its buttons are more comfortable to handle and so is its menu, with it various options.

Canon PowerShot ELPH 300

Best Ultra-Compact up to $200

Two new ultra-compacts share the title of 'best up to $200' - those are the Sony Cyber-shot WX50 and the Panasonic Lumix SZ7.

The WX50 is smaller and lighter than the SZ7, being 19mm thick and weighing just 117 grams, including a battery and a memory card. The SZ7, weighing 133 grams, 21mm thick body packs double the zoom range - x10 compared to x5.

Both cameras have a 25mm wide-angle lens, Full HD video with optical zoom and stereo sound, but the WX10 has a larger maximum aperture, for better support of low-light situations, as well as Sony's excellent sweep panorama feature.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC WX50

Panasonic Lumix DMC SZ7

Best Ultra-Compact up to $250

In this category, there's a battle between the already-proven-to-be-gold Sony Cyber-shot WX10 and the new, just-hit-the-market Cyber-shot WX150.

The WX10 is slightly larger, at 161 grams and just over 23 mm thick, with a 24mm lens and a x7 zoom range. It's largest aperture at the lens' wide-angle setting is f/2.4, which is much wider than average and provides good support for low-light situations, together with the camera's Back-Side Illuminated CMOS sensor.

The WX150 is smaller than the WX10, thinner by almost 2 mm and lighter by almost 20 grams and yet boasts a x10 zoom range. This comes at the cost of a smaller max aperture setting of f/3.3.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC WX10

Sony Cyber-shot DSC WX150

Best Ultra-Compact up to $300

Not necessarily better in terms of image quality or other features, the new Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 comes in at the price of $299. Its uniqueness is in its large zoom range - somehow cramping x12 worth of zoom into a body less than 20mm thick, making it the smallest x12 zoom camera.

If this rubs you the right way, by all means, get it, but bear in mind that the ELPH 520 uses a smaller than average imaging sensor, not much larger than that of the Iphone 4S. Read about it in this post: Largest and smallest sensors announced by Canon.

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520

 

-eyalg



When you're done reading, please support my site by using these affiliate links
for buying or for checking camera prices - B&H, Amazon, Adorama, thank you!

This entry was posted in Advice and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to What's the best ultra-compact camera your money can buy?

  1. Craig Brown says:

    We have been given 2 cameras (1) PowerShot SX500 IS. And (2) Nikon CoolPix S8200
    My question is ,which in your opinion is the best ? For a couple who within week well be retiring doing what retirees do THANKS FOR YOUR HELP

    Craig and Diane.

    .

    • eyalg says:

      Hi Craig and Diane,

      Between the SX500 and the S8200, I would probably choose the S8200.
      The SX500 is much newer and has a significantly larger zoom range,
      but the S8200 has enough zoom power to my taste and could fit in
      your pocket, what you can't say about the SX500.

      Good luck,
      -eyalg

  2. Max says:

    Hi,
    I am looking to buy a compact camera and have three choices in mind. If you could add any insight on which one you think would be the best out of the three, I would greatly appreciate it :) What's important to me is having a really good zoom, taking action shots and low light shots. I am not big on playing with the settings so manual control is not a big deal to me. I do have a SLR camera, but don't always take it with me. The three cameras that I am looking at are the Nikon coolpix S9500 vs Sony cybershot WX300 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ40.

    Thank you for your help,
    Max

    • eyalg says:

      Hi Max,

      Taking into account that all these cameras are new in the market,
      and that I haven't yet tested them myself, I can only deduct from
      their predecessors and from the technical specifications.
      Based on my experience with Lumix TZ30, I can fairly say that
      it was the best compact zoom in its class at the time.
      It's a fun camera to work with, and the TZ40 should be the same.
      The WX300's specs are nothing short of amazing - the same x20 zoom
      power in such a small body which can easily fit in your pocket?
      That's a very interesting camera, I must say.
      Sorry there's no bottom line here. The TZ40 is a very capable
      camera, with a great deal of power tucked inside it.
      The WX300 seems like a wonderful camera to work with but
      I'll only know for sure once I have a chance to review it.

      Good luck,
      -eyalg

  3. link says:

    where\'s the FS Viewer?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>